Comments on: LoadRunner Licensing Agreement http://www.myloadtest.com/loadrunner-licensing-agreement/ Performance Testing with a LoadRunner focus Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:27:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Geoff http://www.myloadtest.com/loadrunner-licensing-agreement/#comment-17181 Geoff Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:24:01 +0000 http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=50#comment-17181 according to the HP people I've talked to recently, (sales and support) it is ok to use the LR controller in a datacenter via RDP, however those provisions in the EUA are designed to prevent companies from buying a single copy of loadrunner then either A: providing remote execution capabillity to outsorce contracters in india or elsewhere B: a multinatiional buying a license for one location and providing RDP or citrix or other access to other business units across the globe. according to the HP people I’ve talked to recently, (sales and support) it is ok to use the LR controller in a datacenter via RDP, however those provisions in the EUA are designed to prevent companies from buying a single copy of loadrunner then either

A: providing remote execution capabillity to outsorce contracters in india or elsewhere

B: a multinatiional buying a license for one location and providing RDP or citrix or other access to other business units across the globe.

]]> By: Will http://www.myloadtest.com/loadrunner-licensing-agreement/#comment-16857 Will Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:09:02 +0000 http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=50#comment-16857 The license agreement for LR version 9.0 allows for remote access. The license agreement for LR version 9.0 allows for remote access.

]]> By: mohan http://www.myloadtest.com/loadrunner-licensing-agreement/#comment-423 mohan Fri, 19 May 2006 17:27:53 +0000 http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=50#comment-423 Hi Iam gettin one problem during the execution time .. :"PAGE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THIS TIME " i.e Dynamic value (JOBNUMBER=2132332)is adding into HTTP Request... EX: HTTP://182.121.123./DFDD/DFD/JOBNUMBER=2132332 Really i'll appreciate for you help Thx mohan Hi

Iam gettin one problem during the execution time ..
:”PAGE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THIS TIME ”

i.e Dynamic value (JOBNUMBER=2132332)is adding into HTTP Request…
EX: HTTP://182.121.123./DFDD/DFD/JOBNUMBER=2132332

Really i’ll appreciate for you help
Thx
mohan

]]> By: Brian Wilson http://www.myloadtest.com/loadrunner-licensing-agreement/#comment-211 Brian Wilson Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:02:16 +0000 http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=50#comment-211 The remote access clause is just stupid. I've worked at least 3 dozen LR engagements with not more than 2 where the controller was not accessed remotely for the reasons you stated. In most cases, I did not have access to the server room where the controller was located. In some cases, I didn't even know where that room was! I'd like to see that clause prosecuted. The remote access clause is just stupid. I’ve worked at least 3 dozen LR engagements with not more than 2 where the controller was not accessed remotely for the reasons you stated. In most cases, I did not have access to the server room where the controller was located. In some cases, I didn’t even know where that room was!

I’d like to see that clause prosecuted.

]]> By: Anon http://www.myloadtest.com/loadrunner-licensing-agreement/#comment-190 Anon Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:42:53 +0000 http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=50#comment-190 No-one reads those things anyway. Just look at the one below... <i>Questions concerning this Agreement should be sent to the address set forth below. By installing this software you accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior, forsaking all other deities in exchange for his everlasting love, forgiveness, and mysterious but tasty wafers. Any notices or correspondences will be effective if sent to such address.</i> See <a href="http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=3298" rel="nofollow">Something Awful</a> for more... No-one reads those things anyway. Just look at the one below…

Questions concerning this Agreement should be sent to the address set forth below. By installing this software you accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior, forsaking all other deities in exchange for his everlasting love, forgiveness, and mysterious but tasty wafers. Any notices or correspondences will be effective if sent to such address.

See Something Awful for more…

]]> By: Vikram Chandna http://www.myloadtest.com/loadrunner-licensing-agreement/#comment-184 Vikram Chandna Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:23:26 +0000 http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=50#comment-184 Yeah, Mercury licensing is despicable. I particularly don't like the section on creating a software with similar features. All performance testing tools have similat features and performance testing has existed longer than Mercury. I had once performed a detailed analysis of Loadrunner license. It appeared most restrictive. The most annoying was that I cannot validate LR numbers using any other tool. Also we cannot use any other tool to supplement LR capability or license. It annoying, because Mercury only own the tool. It cannot dictate what else I use for my application. regards, Vikram Yeah, Mercury licensing is despicable. I particularly don’t like the section on creating a software with similar features. All performance testing tools have similat features and performance testing has existed longer than Mercury.
I had once performed a detailed analysis of Loadrunner license. It appeared most restrictive. The most annoying was that I cannot validate LR numbers using any other tool. Also we cannot use any other tool to supplement LR capability or license. It annoying, because Mercury only own the tool. It cannot dictate what else I use for my application.
regards,
Vikram

]]>