<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performance Testing Notepad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myloadtest.com/performance-testing-notepad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myloadtest.com/performance-testing-notepad/</link>
	<description>Performance Testing with a LoadRunner focus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.myloadtest.com/performance-testing-notepad/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=61#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. In my experiences, this is all-too-often the case. And I don&#039;t think that it is necessarily tool-based testing, but also getting hung up on load testing, even if it is a low-tech, 20-people-in-a-room test. Performance testing and load testing are two very different things. Performance testing when a system is not under load is a critical test to conduct.

I should point out one thing to keep in mind. (Not saying you missed the mark. It wasn&#039;t applicable to your test, so it just wasn&#039;t covered.) It is possible for your system to improve performance as load increases, as cache-hit-ratios improve and modules stay loaded into memory. Again, performance testing under zero load is critical, as we would not want to impact that one off-hour user with 0% cache hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. In my experiences, this is all-too-often the case. And I don&#8217;t think that it is necessarily tool-based testing, but also getting hung up on load testing, even if it is a low-tech, 20-people-in-a-room test. Performance testing and load testing are two very different things. Performance testing when a system is not under load is a critical test to conduct.</p>
<p>I should point out one thing to keep in mind. (Not saying you missed the mark. It wasn&#8217;t applicable to your test, so it just wasn&#8217;t covered.) It is possible for your system to improve performance as load increases, as cache-hit-ratios improve and modules stay loaded into memory. Again, performance testing under zero load is critical, as we would not want to impact that one off-hour user with 0% cache hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Kouznetsov</title>
		<link>http://www.myloadtest.com/performance-testing-notepad/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Kouznetsov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 06:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=61#comment-560</guid>
		<description>So true ... .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true &#8230; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Moncrieff</title>
		<link>http://www.myloadtest.com/performance-testing-notepad/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Moncrieff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myloadtest.com/?p=61#comment-546</guid>
		<description>I once worked with a guy from IBM who maintained that â€œNotepad is the best piece of software that Microsoft has ever writtenâ€.

When I pointed out all the features that were missing when compared to almost any other text editor, he stuck to his original opinion.

â€œNotepad doesnâ€™t pretend to be all things to all people. Microsoft implemented a small number of features and they just workâ€œ.

I guess that is a valid enough point although, being a longtime Linux user, I think that he just liked the idea of Microsoftâ€™s best software being a tiny, feature-poor tool that has been implemented better by everyone else that has ever tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once worked with a guy from IBM who maintained that â€œNotepad is the best piece of software that Microsoft has ever writtenâ€.</p>
<p>When I pointed out all the features that were missing when compared to almost any other text editor, he stuck to his original opinion.</p>
<p>â€œNotepad doesnâ€™t pretend to be all things to all people. Microsoft implemented a small number of features and they just workâ€œ.</p>
<p>I guess that is a valid enough point although, being a longtime Linux user, I think that he just liked the idea of Microsoftâ€™s best software being a tiny, feature-poor tool that has been implemented better by everyone else that has ever tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
